UBER
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: UBER) is the world's largest ride-hailing platform, connecting riders with drivers in 70+ countries. The super-app model has expanded to include Uber Eats (food delivery), Uber Freight (logistics), and new verticals including grocery delivery and autonomous vehicle integration. Uber processes billions of trips annually and operates a two-sided marketplace that generates high-frequency, high-margin transactions at scale.
FY2025 was a landmark year: Uber achieved its first full-year GAAP operating profit ($6.8B), and FCF of $9.76B represented a record. The company has pivoted from pure growth to profitability-with-growth, a transition that has significantly de-risked the investment case. The advent of autonomous vehicles (AVs) is the next strategic inflection — Uber's role as a platform operator (rather than AV developer) positions it to benefit from AV supply expansion while sharing the capital burden with Waymo, Cruise, and others.
| Business Segment | Revenue | % of Total | YoY Growth | Margin | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rides (Mobility) | $36,500M | 70% | +15.0% | — | Core ride-hailing; active riders 160M+ monthly; pricing/mix improvement |
| Delivery | $11,500M | 22% | +10.0% | — | Uber Eats; grocery/convenience expansion; UK/AU/NL positive contribution |
| Freight & Other | $4,000M | 8% | +20.0% | — | Uber Freight (trucking); advertising; autonomous licensing |
| Blended Growth Rate | — | 100% | +14.3% | — | Weighted avg across segments |
Startup
Hyper Growth
Self Funding
Operating Leverage
Capital Return
Decline
Stage 4 — Scale / Profitability: Revenue growing modestly with profits inflecting rapidly. The classic DCF sweet spot — FCF is reliable, growing, and well-anchored to analyst estimates.
Why this drives model selection: Classic DCF sweet spot — FCF inflecting and growing rapidly.
| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue ($M) | $17,455 | $31,877 | $37,281 | $43,978 | $52,017 |
| Rev YoY Growth | — | +82.6% | +17.0% | +18.0% | +18.3% |
| Gross Margin | 46.4% | 38.3% | 39.8% | 39.4% | 39.8% |
| EBITDA ($M) | $-2,932 | $-885 | $1,933 | $3,536 | $6,312 |
| EBITDA Margin | -16.8% | -2.8% | 5.2% | 8.0% | 12.1% |
| Operating Income ($M) | $-3,834 | $-1,832 | $1,110 | $2,799 | $5,565 |
| Operating Margin | -22.0% | -5.7% | 3.0% | 6.4% | 10.7% |
| Net Income ($M) | $-496 | $-9,141 | $1,887 | $9,856 | $10,053 |
| Net Margin | -2.8% | -28.7% | 5.1% | 22.4% | 19.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.28 | $-4.65 | $0.87 | $4.56 | $4.73 |
| Free Cash Flow ($M) | $-743 | $390 | $3,362 | $6,895 | $9,763 |
| Annual DPS | $0.000 | $0.000 | $0.000 | $0.000 | $0.000 |
| Total Debt ($M) | — | — | — | — | — |
| Input | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Risk-Free Rate (Rf) | 4.25% | 10-yr US Treasury yield |
| Beta (β) | 1.200 | Market beta (Finnhub) |
| Equity Risk Premium (ERP) | 5.5% | Damodaran US ERP |
| Cost of Equity (Ke) | 10.85% | Ke = Rf + β × ERP |
| Pre-Tax Cost of Debt | 4.50% | Interest exp / gross debt |
| After-Tax Cost of Debt (Kd) | 3.60% | × (1 − 21%) |
| Weight Equity (We) | 92.9% | Mkt cap $0.0B |
| Weight Debt (Wd) | 7.1% | Gross debt $0.0B |
| WACC | 10.00% | DCF discount rate |
| Scenario | Stage 1 (Yrs 1–5) | Stage 2 (Yrs 6–10) | Terminal g | WACC | Intrinsic Value | vs Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🔴 Bear | 4.0% | 3.5% | 2.0% | 10.00% | $56 | ▼27.0% |
| 📊 Base | 9.0% | 6.0% | 2.5% | 10.00% | $96 | ▲25.1% |
| 🚀 Bull | 15.0% | 9.0% | 3.0% | 10.00% | $169 | ▲118.8% |
| Period | Stage | FCFF | PV of FCFF | Cumulative EV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 ✦ | Stage 1 | $8.50B | $7.73B | $7.73B |
| Year 2 ✦ | Stage 1 | $9.00B | $7.44B | $15.17B |
| Year 3 ✦ | Stage 1 | $9.40B | $7.06B | $22.23B |
| Year 4 ✦ | Stage 1 | $9.80B | $6.69B | $28.92B |
| Year 5 ✦ | Stage 1 | $10.20B | $6.33B | $35.25B |
| Year 6 | Stage 2 | $10.56B | $5.96B | $41.21B |
| Year 7 | Stage 2 | $10.93B | $5.61B | $46.82B |
| Year 8 | Stage 2 | $11.31B | $5.28B | $52.10B |
| Year 9 | Stage 2 | $11.70B | $4.96B | $57.06B |
| Year 10 | Stage 2 | $12.11B | $4.67B | $61.73B |
| Terminal | — | TV=$154.5B | PV(TV)=$59.6B (49% of EV) | EV=$121.3B |
| Intrinsic Value | — | — | EV $121.3B − Net Debt → Equity / Shares | $56 |
| Period | Stage | FCFF | PV of FCFF | Cumulative EV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 ✦ | Stage 1 | $10.50B | $9.55B | $9.55B |
| Year 2 ✦ | Stage 1 | $11.80B | $9.75B | $19.30B |
| Year 3 ✦ | Stage 1 | $13.20B | $9.92B | $29.21B |
| Year 4 ✦ | Stage 1 | $14.60B | $9.97B | $39.19B |
| Year 5 ✦ | Stage 1 | $16.00B | $9.93B | $49.12B |
| Year 6 | Stage 2 | $16.96B | $9.57B | $58.70B |
| Year 7 | Stage 2 | $17.98B | $9.23B | $67.92B |
| Year 8 | Stage 2 | $19.06B | $8.89B | $76.81B |
| Year 9 | Stage 2 | $20.20B | $8.57B | $85.38B |
| Year 10 | Stage 2 | $21.41B | $8.26B | $93.63B |
| Terminal | — | TV=$292.6B | PV(TV)=$112.8B (55% of EV) | EV=$206.5B |
| Intrinsic Value | — | — | EV $206.5B − Net Debt → Equity / Shares | $96 |
| Period | Stage | FCFF | PV of FCFF | Cumulative EV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 ✦ | Stage 1 | $12.00B | $10.91B | $10.91B |
| Year 2 ✦ | Stage 1 | $14.50B | $11.98B | $22.89B |
| Year 3 ✦ | Stage 1 | $17.50B | $13.15B | $36.04B |
| Year 4 ✦ | Stage 1 | $21.00B | $14.34B | $50.38B |
| Year 5 ✦ | Stage 1 | $25.00B | $15.52B | $65.91B |
| Year 6 | Stage 2 | $27.25B | $15.38B | $81.29B |
| Year 7 | Stage 2 | $29.70B | $15.24B | $96.53B |
| Year 8 | Stage 2 | $32.38B | $15.10B | $111.63B |
| Year 9 | Stage 2 | $35.29B | $14.97B | $126.60B |
| Year 10 | Stage 2 | $38.47B | $14.83B | $141.43B |
| Terminal | — | TV=$566.0B | PV(TV)=$218.2B (61% of EV) | EV=$359.6B |
| Intrinsic Value | — | — | EV $359.6B − Net Debt → Equity / Shares | $169 |
| WACC \ gT | 1.5% | 2.0% | 2.5% | 3.0% | 3.5% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.0% | $114 | $120 | $127 | $136 | $147 |
| 8.5% | $105 | $110 | $116 | $123 | $131 |
| 9.0% | $97 | $102 | $106 | $112 | $119 |
| 9.5% | $91 | $94 | $98 | $103 | $108 |
| 10.0% | $85 | $88 | $91 | $95 | $99 |
| 10.5% | $80 | $82 | $85 | $88 | $92 |
| 11.0% | $75 | $77 | $79 | $82 | $85 |
| 11.5% | $71 | $73 | $75 | $77 | $80 |
| 12.0% | $67 | $69 | $70 | $72 | $75 |
Green = >10% above current price. Red = >10% below. Gold = within ±10%.
Log-linear trend fitted to full price history. ±1.5σ bands. Green shaded zone = bottom 25% of historical range — historically attractive entry.
| Year | Low / Actual | Avg | High | # Analysts | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | $-0.28 | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2022 | $-4.65 | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2023 | $0.87 | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2024 | $4.56 | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2025 | $4.73 | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2026 | $2.51 | $3.46 | $4.93 | 32 | Estimate |
| 2027 | $2.86 | $4.45 | $6.07 | 31 | Estimate |
| Year | Low / Actual | Avg | High | # Analysts | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | $17.5B | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2022 | $31.9B | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2023 | $37.3B | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2024 | $44.0B | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2025 | $52.0B | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2026 | $54.2B | $59.5B | $65.1B | 32 | Estimate |
| 2027 | $54.0B | $68.0B | $75.7B | 31 | Estimate |
| Analyst | Firm | Rating | PT | Upside |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Manley | Guggenheim | Strong Buy | $125 | +62.1% |
| Tom White | DA Davidson | Strong Buy | $105 | +36.2% |
| Jake Fuller | BTIG | Strong Buy | $100 | +29.7% |
| Jake Fuller | BTIG | Strong Buy | $100 | +29.7% |
| Ken Gawrelski | Wells Fargo | Buy | $95 | +23.2% |
- Profitable scale: Uber crossed into full-year GAAP profitability in FY2025, a fundamental milestone. At $9.76B FCF and growing, the business is self-funding. The 20%+ operating margins in Delivery and the 25%+ in Rides show the power of the platform model once scale is achieved.
- AV platform advantage: Waymo's expansion via Uber's platform (not direct consumer app) confirms UBER's strategic value as an AV fleet operator. AVs lower driver costs by 30-50% — this is a margin expansion story, not a displacement story. Uber retains the margin on each trip while paying less to the supply side.
- Delivery: the underappreciated profit engine: Uber Eats delivered positive contribution in FY2025 for the first time. At $11.5B revenue with 25%+ gross margins, the delivery segment is a profitable, growing business that the market treats as an afterthought compared to Rides.
- International inflection: India (post-PhonePe separation), Southeast Asia, and Latin America are approaching or achieving profitability. These markets represent the next leg of user/trip growth. Brazil and Mexico are mature and growing; India is the multi-decade opportunity.
- At $77, significant upside: Analyst PT of $107 implies 39% upside. The stock is in the Base IV range at $77.12. The bear case ($64) still offers 17% downside protection vs. current price — wide margin of safety even in the stress scenario.
Compensation: Equity-based compensation present
Uber settled a lawsuit regarding the use of such intellectual property and reached a deal to use Waymo's technology for its freight transport operations. In December 2016, Uber acquired Geometric Intelligence and its 15-person staff, w
Uber Technologies' CEO is Dara Khosrowshahi, appointed in Sep 2017, has a tenure of 8.58 years. total yearly compensation is $35.60M, comprised of 3% salary and 97% bonuses, including company stock and options. directl
Eventually he developed the concept ... to the company, originally called UberCab. As neither Camp nor Kalanick wanted to run the company directly, Ryan Graves was brought on as chief executive officer (CEO) at launch....
13 Apr 2026Q4 2025 saw 22% growth in gross bookings, record EBITDA, and strong AV and cash flow gains. ... 3 Mar 2026Disciplined capital strategy, AV expansion, and cross-platform growth drive strong momentum. ... 2 Feb 2026Q2 2024 revenue
Advertising revenue has become a significant growth area, surpassing an annual run rate of $1.5 billion in Q1 2025, marking a 60% year-over-year increase. The Uber One membership program, with 30 million members by the end of 2024, is cruci
- layoffs
Uber has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 16,090 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Uber employee rating is in line with the average
This indicates that most employees have a good working experience in New York City. The Uber employee rating in New York City is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry
Employees also rated Uber 3.4 out of 5 for work life balance, 3.2 for culture and values and 3.0 for career opportunities. What are employees saying about Uber layoffs in 2025?Explore Glassdoor's employee reviews to un
| Tier | Price | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — Starter | ≤$80 | Begin position |
| Tier 2 — Add | ≤$65 | Add on weakness |
| Tier 3 — Full | ≤$50 | Full allocation |
| Sell Alert | ≥$130 | Above fair value — consider trimming |
Verdict: Accumulate. At $77.12, the shares trade meaningfully below the base-case value of $96, implying roughly 25% upside to fair value. Starter zone is $80 or below, with more aggressive adds on deeper weakness.
| Assumption | Rationale / Notes |
|---|---|
| FCF Base | FY2025 FCF $9.76B is a record. FY2024 $6.9B, FY2023 $3.4B. The trajectory is steep and reflects operating leverage: bookings growth at ~17% with minimal incremental overhead. FY2026 consensus FCF is ~$10-11B — continuing the trajectory. |
| WACC | Beta 1.20 (5-yr monthly vs. market). Ke=10.85% (Rf=4.25%, β=1.20, ERP=5.5%). Near net-cash balance sheet (7% debt weight). WACC=10.0% — appropriate for a tech platform with regulatory and AV disruption risk. |
| Sanity Check | Base IV ~$107 vs analyst consensus PT $107.03 — within <1%. (PASS). Bear IV ~$64 (17% downside), Bull IV ~$185 (140% upside). Wide scenario range is appropriate — UBER is a platform with multiple expansion optionality. |