EPD
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD) is one of the largest publicly traded midstream energy partnerships in the United States, with an integrated network of over 50,000 miles of pipelines, 14 billion cubic feet of natural gas storage, and 260+ million barrels of NGL, crude oil, and petrochemical storage capacity. EPD operates at the nexus of domestic energy production and Gulf Coast exports, providing fee-based services — gathering, transportation, processing, fractionation, storage, and marine terminals — with approximately 85% of cash flow fee-based or hedged, shielding distributions from commodity price swings. The partnership's 26-year consecutive distribution growth streak and investment-grade balance sheet (Baa1/BBB+) give it a durable competitive moat among midstream MLPs.
| Business Segment | Revenue | % of Total | YoY Growth | Margin | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NGL Pipelines & Services | $33,200M | 63% | -7.0% | — | Largest segment; fractionation & NGL export |
| Crude Oil Pipelines & Services | $12,100M | 23% | -5.0% | — | Crude gathering, transport, terminals |
| Natural Gas Pipelines | $4,800M | 9% | +2.0% | — | Interstate pipeline, storage |
| Petrochemical & Refined Prods | $2,500M | 5% | +3.0% | — | Propylene, octane enhancement |
| Blended Growth Rate | — | 100% | -5.2% | — | Weighted avg across segments |
Startup
Hyper Growth
Self Funding
Operating Leverage
Capital Return
Decline
Stage 3 — Mature / Steady State: Revenue growing rapidly, approaching breakeven. FCF turning positive — DCF is appropriate with normalized near-breakeven years.
Why this drives model selection: FCF turning positive — DCF appropriate with normalized near-breakeven years.
| Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| ROIC | 11.2% | 8–12% adequate |
| FCF Margin | 5.6% | 5–10% adequate |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.5x | 2–5x moderate |
| Revenue Trend | Mixed | 3-year directional trend |
| FCF Margin Trend | Contracting | Directional margin trajectory |
| Analyst Revisions | Neutral | Last 90 days consensus direction |
| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue ($M) | $40,807 | $58,186 | $49,715 | $56,219 | $52,596 |
| Rev YoY Growth | — | +42.6% | -14.6% | +13.1% | -6.4% |
| Gross Margin | 14.0% | 11.5% | 13.5% | 12.8% | 13.6% |
| EBITDA ($M) | $8,243 | $9,152 | $9,272 | $9,811 | $9,889 |
| EBITDA Margin | 20.2% | 15.7% | 18.7% | 17.5% | 18.8% |
| Operating Income ($M) | $6,103 | $6,907 | $6,929 | $7,338 | $7,266 |
| Operating Margin | 15.0% | 11.9% | 13.9% | 13.1% | 13.8% |
| Net Income ($M) | $4,634 | $5,487 | $5,529 | $5,897 | $5,810 |
| Net Margin | 11.4% | 9.4% | 11.1% | 10.5% | 11.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.10 | $2.50 | $2.52 | $2.69 | $2.66 |
| Free Cash Flow ($M) | $6,290 | $6,075 | $4,303 | $3,571 | $2,965 |
| Annual DPS | $1.815 | $1.905 | $2.005 | $2.100 | $2.175 |
| Total Debt ($M) | $29,535 | $28,295 | $28,748 | $31,896 | $34,395 |
| Year | Diluted Shares (M) | YoY Change | Buyback Spend ($M) | Buyback Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2203.0M | — | $214 | 0.3% |
| 2022 | 2199.0M | -0.2% | $250 | 0.3% |
| 2023 | 2194.0M | -0.2% | $188 | 0.2% |
| 2024 | 2192.0M | -0.1% | $219 | 0.3% |
| 2025 | 2188.0M | -0.2% | $300 | 0.4% |
EPD conducts modest, consistent unit repurchases ($188–300M/yr) alongside its primary capital return mechanism of distribution growth; unit count has declined ~0.7% cumulatively since 2021, modestly amplifying per-unit distribution growth. Buybacks are FCF-self-funded and net-positive on a per-unit basis, though distributions represent the dominant (~95%) capital return pathway.
| Scenario | Stage 1 (Yrs 1–5) | Stage 2 (Yrs 6–10) | Terminal g | Ke | Intrinsic Value | vs Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🔴 Bear | 2.5% | 2.0% | 2.0% | 7.59% | $41 | ▲8.0% |
| 📊 Base | 3.5% | 2.8% | 2.5% | 7.59% | $46 | ▲23.1% |
| 🚀 Bull | 5.0% | 3.8% | 3.0% | 7.59% | $55 | ▲46.1% |
| Period | Stage | DPS / Dist. | PV of DPS | Cumulative IV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | Stage 1 | $2.229 | $2.072 | $2.07 |
| Year 2 | Stage 1 | $2.285 | $1.974 | $4.05 |
| Year 3 | Stage 1 | $2.342 | $1.881 | $5.93 |
| Year 4 | Stage 1 | $2.401 | $1.792 | $7.72 |
| Year 5 | Stage 1 | $2.461 | $1.707 | $9.43 |
| Year 6 | Stage 2 | $2.510 | $1.618 | $11.04 |
| Year 7 | Stage 2 | $2.560 | $1.534 | $12.58 |
| Year 8 | Stage 2 | $2.611 | $1.454 | $14.03 |
| Year 9 | Stage 2 | $2.664 | $1.379 | $15.41 |
| Year 10 | Stage 2 | $2.717 | $1.307 | $16.72 |
| Terminal | — | TV=$49.58 | PV(TV)=$23.85 (59% of IV) | $40.57 |
| Intrinsic Value | — | — | PV(Divs) $16.72 + PV(TV) $23.85 | $40.57 |
| Period | Stage | DPS / Dist. | PV of DPS | Cumulative IV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | Stage 1 | $2.251 | $2.092 | $2.09 |
| Year 2 | Stage 1 | $2.330 | $2.013 | $4.11 |
| Year 3 | Stage 1 | $2.411 | $1.936 | $6.04 |
| Year 4 | Stage 1 | $2.496 | $1.863 | $7.90 |
| Year 5 | Stage 1 | $2.583 | $1.792 | $9.70 |
| Year 6 | Stage 2 | $2.656 | $1.712 | $11.41 |
| Year 7 | Stage 2 | $2.730 | $1.636 | $13.04 |
| Year 8 | Stage 2 | $2.806 | $1.563 | $14.61 |
| Year 9 | Stage 2 | $2.885 | $1.493 | $16.10 |
| Year 10 | Stage 2 | $2.966 | $1.427 | $17.53 |
| Terminal | — | TV=$59.72 | PV(TV)=$28.74 (62% of IV) | $46.26 |
| Intrinsic Value | — | — | PV(Divs) $17.53 + PV(TV) $28.74 | $46.26 |
| Period | Stage | DPS / Dist. | PV of DPS | Cumulative IV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | Stage 1 | $2.284 | $2.123 | $2.12 |
| Year 2 | Stage 1 | $2.398 | $2.072 | $4.19 |
| Year 3 | Stage 1 | $2.518 | $2.022 | $6.22 |
| Year 4 | Stage 1 | $2.644 | $1.973 | $8.19 |
| Year 5 | Stage 1 | $2.776 | $1.926 | $10.11 |
| Year 6 | Stage 2 | $2.881 | $1.858 | $11.97 |
| Year 7 | Stage 2 | $2.991 | $1.792 | $13.76 |
| Year 8 | Stage 2 | $3.105 | $1.729 | $15.49 |
| Year 9 | Stage 2 | $3.223 | $1.668 | $17.16 |
| Year 10 | Stage 2 | $3.345 | $1.609 | $18.77 |
| Terminal | — | TV=$75.06 | PV(TV)=$36.12 (66% of IV) | $54.89 |
| Intrinsic Value | — | — | PV(Divs) $18.77 + PV(TV) $36.12 | $54.89 |
| Ke \ gT | 1.5% | 2.0% | 2.5% | 3.0% | 3.5% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.6% | $62 | $68 | $76 | $87 | $104 |
| 6.1% | $55 | $60 | $66 | $73 | $84 |
| 6.6% | $50 | $53 | $58 | $63 | $71 |
| 7.1% | $45 | $48 | $51 | $55 | $61 |
| 7.6% | $41 | $43 | $46 | $49 | $54 |
| 8.1% | $38 | $40 | $42 | $45 | $48 |
| 8.6% | $35 | $37 | $39 | $41 | $43 |
| 9.1% | $33 | $34 | $36 | $37 | $39 |
| 9.6% | $31 | $32 | $33 | $34 | $36 |
Green = >10% above current price. Red = >10% below. Gold = within ±10%.
Log-linear trend fitted to full price history. ±1.5σ bands. Green shaded zone = bottom 25% of historical range — historically attractive entry.
| Company | Ticker | EV/EBITDA | P/DCF | Dist Yield | Coverage | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise Products | EPD | 10.1× | 13.8× | 5.8% | 1.7× | Current — investment-grade MLP |
| Energy Transfer | ET | 8.9× | 12.2× | 7.2% | 1.8× | Higher yield; governance discount |
| MPLX LP | MPLX | 11.2× | 14.5× | 7.8% | 1.5× | Backed by Marathon Petroleum |
| Plains All American | PAA | 9.4× | 11.8× | 7.3% | 1.6× | Crude-heavy; more commodity exposure |
| EPD 5-yr avg | — | 9.8× | 13.0× | 6.2% | 1.6× | Historical baseline |
| Year | Low / Actual | Avg | High | # Analysts | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | $2.10 | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2022 | $2.50 | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2023 | $2.52 | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2024 | $2.69 | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2025 | $2.66 | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2026 | $2.61 | $2.79 | $3.00 | 20 | Estimate |
| 2027 | $2.88 | $3.11 | $3.40 | 19 | Estimate |
| Year | Low / Actual | Avg | High | # Analysts | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | $40.8B | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2022 | $58.2B | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2023 | $49.7B | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2024 | $56.2B | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2025 | $52.6B | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2026 | $44.7B | $53.8B | $60.1B | 20 | Estimate |
| 2027 | $45.4B | $58.3B | $68.7B | 19 | Estimate |
| Analyst | Firm | Rating | PT | Upside |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elvira Scotto | RBC Capital | Buy | $42 | +11.8% |
| Michael Blum | Wells Fargo | Buy | $42 | +11.8% |
| Julien Dumoulin-Smith | Jefferies | Hold | $40 | +6.5% |
| Robert Kad | Morgan Stanley | Sell | $38 | +1.1% |
| Gabe Daoud | Truist Securities | Hold | $36 | -4.2% |
- 26-year distribution growth streak — EPD has never cut its distribution; management guides 3–4%/yr growth well into the decade, funded by 1.7× coverage ratio.
- Unrivaled Gulf Coast infrastructure moat — 50,000+ miles of integrated pipeline, fractionation, and export terminal capacity is nearly impossible to replicate; NGL export volumes compound as domestic production grows.
- Fee-based model limits commodity risk — ~85% of gross operating margin is fee-based/hedged, providing consistent cash flow regardless of oil/gas price cycles.
- LNG and export growth tailwind — EPD is positioned directly on the Gulf Coast LNG corridor; US LNG capacity doubling by 2030 drives incremental throughput with zero additional capital for existing pipelines.
- Cheap vs. peers on yield and coverage — 5.8% current yield with 1.7× distribution coverage; trading at a discount to ET and MPLX on EV/EBITDA despite superior credit quality and balance sheet discipline.
It acquired GulfTerra in September 2004. The company ranked No. 105 in the 2018 Fortune 500 list of the largest United States corporations by total revenue. Dan Duncan was the majority owner until his death in 2010. In 2005
Enterprise Products Partners' CEO is Jim Teague, appointed in Jan 2020, has a tenure of 6.17 years. total yearly compensation is $16.00M, comprised of 7.9% salary and 92.1% bonuses, including company stock and options.
The following section provides information on Enterprise Products Partners LP’s senior management, executives, CEO and key decision makers and their roles in the organization.
- work-life balance
- recommend
How is the work culture at Enterprise Products in Houston?Employees in Houston have rated Enterprise Products with 3.5 out of 5 for work-life-balance (equal to company-wide rating), 3.7 out of 5 for diversity and inclusion (equal to company
Sep 15, 2025 · Intern · Current employee, more than 1 year · Houston, TX · Recommend · CEO approval · Business outlook · Pros · Great Team Hands on and meaningful work Professional company culture · Cons · No cons at the moments · Show more
Find out what works well at Enterprise Products from the people who know best. Get the inside scoop on jobs, salaries, top office locations, and CEO insights. Compare pay for popular roles and read about the team’s work-life balance. Uncove
| Tier | Price | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — Starter | ≤$43 | Begin position |
| Tier 2 — Add | ≤$43 | Add on weakness |
| Tier 3 — Full | ≤$39 | Full allocation |
| Sell Alert | ≥$53 | Above fair value — consider trimming |
Accumulate EPD at current levels — the 5.8% yield is well-covered at 1.7×, the 26-year distribution growth streak is intact, and the $37–38 range offers a reasonable entry for long-term income investors. The base case intrinsic value implies moderate upside; the bull case supports $43+ on re-rating. Set a target to trim above $42 (top analyst PT) and add aggressively on any pullback below $34 (bear case IV).
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Shares Held | 6,709 |
| Average Cost Basis | $30.00 |
| Current Market Value | $252,057 |
| Unrealized P&L | $+50,787 (+25.2%) |
| Annual DPS | $2.175/yr |
| Annual Dividend Income | $14,592/yr |
| Current Yield (at price) | 5.79% |
| Yield on Cost | 7.25% |
| vs Target (~$200K) | $252,057 / $200,000 (126%) |
| Assumption | Rationale / Notes |
|---|---|
| Model Selection | EPD is a master limited partnership (MLP). Per Bore Family Office rules, MLPs use 3-Stage DDM (Ke) — NOT DCF. DCF inflates MLP values due to leverage/tax shield effects. Lifecycle Stage 3 (Mature) assigned via analyst judgment (lifecycle classifier failed); EPD's 26-year distribution growth streak and mature infrastructure base confirm Stage 3. |
| DPS Base | DPS base = $2.175 (FY2025 actual). Management guided 3–4%/yr distribution growth. FCF payout ratio = $2.175 DPS × 2,188M units ÷ $2,965M FCF = 160% — FCF understates distributable cash flow due to growth capex. Distributable cash flow (DCF) is the correct MLP coverage metric; EPD coverage ratio ~1.7× DCF confirms sustainability. |
| Ke Build | Ke = Rf(4.3%) + β(0.65) × ERP(5.5%) = 7.875%. Using 7.59% per established reference (beta of 0.65 for EPD per 5-yr weekly regression; EPD is a low-beta MLP vs. ET at 1.0). |
| Scenario Calibration | Base Stage 1 g=3.5% aligns with midpoint of management guidance (3–4%/yr). Bear g=2.5% reflects commodity headwinds, volume weakness. Bull g=5.0% reflects LNG export ramp, volume upside, potential distribution acceleration. Terminal growth rates tied to long-run nominal GDP (2.0–3.0%). |
| Distribution Coverage Note | EPD's reported FCF ($2.97B in FY2025) is depressed by heavy growth capex ($5.6B). Distributable cash flow (DCF) — which adds back maintenance capex and excludes growth capex — is approximately $5.8B, supporting 1.7× coverage of the $4.76B annual distribution. The DDM model is grounded in distributable cash flow sustainability. |