UNP
UNP
Union Pacific is a Class I railroad; operates transcontinental network across US; major freight carrier (intermodal, grain, coal, chemicals, etc.).
Startup
Hyper Growth
Self Funding
Operating Leverage
Capital Return
Decline
Stage 3 — Mature Utility-Like: Revenue growing rapidly, approaching breakeven. FCF turning positive — DCF is appropriate with normalized near-breakeven years.
Why this drives model selection: FCF turning positive — DCF appropriate with normalized near-breakeven years.
| Scenario | Stage 1 (Yrs 1–5) | Stage 2 (Yrs 6–10) | Terminal g | WACC | Intrinsic Value | vs Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🔴 Bear | 1.0% | 1.0% | 2.5% | 7.50% | $140 | ▼43.2% |
| 📊 Base | 4.0% | 3.0% | 3.0% | 7.50% | $231 | ▼6.1% |
| 🚀 Bull | 7.0% | 5.0% | 3.5% | 7.50% | $346 | ▲40.8% |
| Period | Stage | FCFF | PV of FCFF | Cumulative EV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 ✦ | Stage 1 | $5.20B | $4.84B | $4.84B |
| Year 2 ✦ | Stage 1 | $5.10B | $4.41B | $9.25B |
| Year 3 ✦ | Stage 1 | $5.15B | $4.15B | $13.40B |
| Year 4 ✦ | Stage 1 | $5.25B | $3.93B | $17.33B |
| Year 5 ✦ | Stage 1 | $5.40B | $3.76B | $21.09B |
| Year 6 | Stage 2 | $5.45B | $3.53B | $24.62B |
| Year 7 | Stage 2 | $5.51B | $3.32B | $27.94B |
| Year 8 | Stage 2 | $5.56B | $3.12B | $31.06B |
| Year 9 | Stage 2 | $5.62B | $2.93B | $33.99B |
| Year 10 | Stage 2 | $5.68B | $2.75B | $36.75B |
| Terminal | — | TV=$116.3B | PV(TV)=$56.5B (61% of EV) | EV=$93.2B |
| Intrinsic Value | — | — | EV $93.2B − Net Debt → Equity / Shares | $140 |
| Period | Stage | FCFF | PV of FCFF | Cumulative EV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 ✦ | Stage 1 | $5.70B | $5.30B | $5.30B |
| Year 2 ✦ | Stage 1 | $6.10B | $5.28B | $10.58B |
| Year 3 ✦ | Stage 1 | $6.55B | $5.27B | $15.85B |
| Year 4 ✦ | Stage 1 | $7.05B | $5.28B | $21.13B |
| Year 5 ✦ | Stage 1 | $7.60B | $5.29B | $26.43B |
| Year 6 | Stage 2 | $7.83B | $5.07B | $31.50B |
| Year 7 | Stage 2 | $8.06B | $4.86B | $36.36B |
| Year 8 | Stage 2 | $8.30B | $4.66B | $41.01B |
| Year 9 | Stage 2 | $8.55B | $4.46B | $45.48B |
| Year 10 | Stage 2 | $8.81B | $4.27B | $49.75B |
| Terminal | — | TV=$201.7B | PV(TV)=$97.8B (66% of EV) | EV=$147.6B |
| Intrinsic Value | — | — | EV $147.6B − Net Debt → Equity / Shares | $231 |
| Period | Stage | FCFF | PV of FCFF | Cumulative EV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 ✦ | Stage 1 | $6.20B | $5.77B | $5.77B |
| Year 2 ✦ | Stage 1 | $6.95B | $6.01B | $11.78B |
| Year 3 ✦ | Stage 1 | $7.75B | $6.24B | $18.02B |
| Year 4 ✦ | Stage 1 | $8.65B | $6.48B | $24.50B |
| Year 5 ✦ | Stage 1 | $9.60B | $6.69B | $31.18B |
| Year 6 | Stage 2 | $10.08B | $6.53B | $37.72B |
| Year 7 | Stage 2 | $10.58B | $6.38B | $44.10B |
| Year 8 | Stage 2 | $11.11B | $6.23B | $50.33B |
| Year 9 | Stage 2 | $11.67B | $6.09B | $56.41B |
| Year 10 | Stage 2 | $12.25B | $5.94B | $62.36B |
| Terminal | — | TV=$317.0B | PV(TV)=$153.8B (71% of EV) | EV=$216.2B |
| Intrinsic Value | — | — | EV $216.2B − Net Debt → Equity / Shares | $346 |
| WACC \ gT | 1.5% | 2.0% | 2.5% | 3.0% | 3.5% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.5% | $261 | $289 | $328 | $381 | $462 |
| 6.0% | $229 | $251 | $278 | $315 | $366 |
| 6.5% | $204 | $220 | $241 | $267 | $302 |
| 7.0% | $183 | $196 | $212 | $232 | $257 |
| 7.5% | $166 | $177 | $189 | $204 | $223 |
| 8.0% | $152 | $160 | $170 | $182 | $196 |
| 8.5% | $139 | $146 | $154 | $164 | $175 |
| 9.0% | $129 | $134 | $141 | $149 | $158 |
| 9.5% | $119 | $124 | $130 | $136 | $143 |
Green = >10% above current price. Red = >10% below. Gold = within ±10%.
Log-linear trend fitted to full price history. ±1.5σ bands. Green shaded zone = bottom 25% of historical range — historically attractive entry.
| Year | Low / Actual | Avg | High | # Analysts | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | $11.21 | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2023 | $10.45 | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2024 | $11.09 | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2025 | $11.98 | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2026 | $12.01 | $12.60 | $13.28 | 29 | Estimate |
| 2027 | $12.64 | $13.67 | $14.65 | 29 | Estimate |
| Year | Low / Actual | Avg | High | # Analysts | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | $0.0B | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2023 | $0.0B | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2024 | $0.0B | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2025 | $0.0B | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2026 | $0.0B | $0.0B | $0.0B | 29 | Estimate |
| 2027 | $0.0B | $0.0B | $0.0B | 29 | Estimate |
| Analyst | Firm | Rating | PT | Upside |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baird | Baird | Buy | $311 | +26.6% |
| Bernstein | Bernstein | Buy | $293 | +19.2% |
| Citigroup | Citigroup | Strong Buy | $270 | +9.9% |
| JP Morgan | JP Morgan | Hold | $265 | +7.8% |
| Evercore ISI | Evercore ISI | Buy | $262 | +6.6% |
- Fortress moat: 32,000-mile network, network density advantages, regulatory barriers
- Strong FCF: $5.5B annually (FCF margin 22.4%); FCF growth modest but durable
- Dividend policy: $5.52/share (2.25% yield), 19-year growth streak, 45.7% payout ratio (conservative)
- Macro sensitivity: railroad volume tied to GDP; macro headwinds into 2026 (0.54% revenue growth FY2025)
- Analyst consensus Buy at $263.09 (+7% upside); valuation reasonable
Compensation: Equity-based compensation present
CEO Jim Vena leads Union Pacific with more than 40 years of railroad industry experience, with a demonstrated track record of driving best-in-class operating and service results.
John C. (Jack) Kenefick, president, Union Pacific Railroad; October 1971 - January 1982; Chairman of the Railroad, 1982 - 1985; CEO, Union Pacific Railroad, 1982 - 1982
When COVID-19 disrupted supply chains in 2020, Fritz maintained essential freight service through revised operating procedures. ... Jim Vena became CEO of Union Pacific Railroad in August 2023. His 40+ years in rail operati
This article examines Union Pacific Railroad’s (UP) ambitious $3.4 billion capital investment plan for 2024, a significant commitment despite a reported 9% decrease in net income in 2023.
Information on stock, financials, earnings, subsidiaries, investors, and executives for Union Pacific. Use the PitchBook Platform to explore the full profile.
- work-life balance
- good pay
- recommend
How satisfied are employees working at Union Pacific?27% of Union Pacific employees would recommend working there to a friend based on Glassdoor reviews. Employees also rated Union Pacific 1.9 out of 5 for work life balance, 2.1 for
Extremely hierarchical - to the point of being insulting to experienced employees. Project approvals take forever because of the numerous layers of management.
Jun 6, 2025 · Railroad conductor · Current employee · San Antonio, TX · Recommend · CEO approval · Business Outlook · Pros · Great place to work, love it · Cons · I love it, good pay for the family · Show more · Sign in to
| Tier | Price | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — Starter | ≤$212 | Begin position |
| Tier 2 — Add | ≤$185 | Add on weakness |
| Tier 3 — Full | ≤$133 | Full allocation |
| Sell Alert | ≥$294 | Above fair value — consider trimming |
Use DCF (FCFF @ WACC), NOT DDM — dividend policy is conservative, and the moat drives long-term value. Model FCF sensitivity to volume growth assumptions. Dividend is a bonus, not the value driver.