V
V
| Business Segment | Revenue | % of Total | YoY Growth | Margin | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US & Canada | $16,800M | 42% | +10.0% | — | Largest market; credit/share growth |
| Europe, Middle East & Africa | $10,800M | 27% | +9.0% | — | Strong developed + EM mix shift |
| Asia Pacific | $6,800M | 17% | +14.0% | — | India, Vietnam key growth engines |
| Latin America | $2,400M | 6% | +18.0% | — | Brazil, Mexico volume acceleration |
| Other / International | $3,200M | 8% | +8.0% | — | Corporate/other, Russia exsolution ongoing |
| Blended Growth Rate | — | 100% | +10.7% | — | Weighted avg across segments |
Startup
Hyper Growth
Self Funding
Operating Leverage
Capital Return
Decline
Stage 4 — Operating Leverage: Revenue growing modestly with profits inflecting rapidly. The classic DCF sweet spot — FCF is reliable, growing, and well-anchored to analyst estimates.
Why this drives model selection: Classic DCF sweet spot — FCF inflecting and growing rapidly.
| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue ($M) | $24,105 | $29,310 | $32,653 | $35,926 | $40,000 |
| Rev YoY Growth | — | +21.6% | +11.4% | +10.0% | +11.3% |
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — |
| EBITDA ($M) | — | — | — | — | — |
| EBITDA Margin | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Income ($M) | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Income ($M) | $12,311 | $14,957 | $17,273 | $20,058 | $20,792 |
| Net Margin | 51.1% | 51.0% | 52.9% | 55.8% | 52.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $5.63 | $7.00 | $8.28 | $9.73 | $10.66 |
| Free Cash Flow ($M) | $14,522 | $17,879 | $19,693 | $21,577 | $22,928 |
| Annual DPS | $1.335 | $1.575 | $1.870 | $2.150 | $2.520 |
| Total Debt ($M) | — | — | — | — | — |
| Year | Diluted Shares (M) | YoY Change | Buyback Spend ($M) | Buyback Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2626.0M | — | $9,000 | 1.1% |
| 2022 | 2514.0M | -4.3% | $9,000 | 1.1% |
| 2023 | 2400.0M | -4.5% | $9,500 | 1.2% |
| 2024 | 2192.0M | -8.7% | $9,500 | 1.4% |
| 2025 | 2180.0M | -0.5% | $9,800 | 1.4% |
Visa reduced shares from 2,626M to 2,180M (-17%) over 5 years. At ~$10B/yr buyback pace, this continues. 3.03% buyback yield + 0.85% dividend yield = 3.87% total shareholder yield. DPS CAGR 13.5% over 5 years. Payout ratio only 24% — buybacks dominate capital return.
| Scenario | Stage 1 (Yrs 1–5) | Stage 2 (Yrs 6–10) | Terminal g | WACC | Intrinsic Value | vs Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🔴 Bear | 6.0% | 4.0% | 2.5% | 9.00% | $204 | ▼35.7% |
| 📊 Base | 8.0% | 5.0% | 3.0% | 8.00% | $298 | ▼6.1% |
| 🚀 Bull | 10.0% | 6.0% | 3.5% | 7.50% | $418 | ▲31.8% |
| Period | Stage | FCFF | PV of FCFF | Cumulative EV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 ✦ | Stage 1 | $24.50B | $22.48B | $22.48B |
| Year 2 ✦ | Stage 1 | $25.97B | $21.86B | $44.34B |
| Year 3 ✦ | Stage 1 | $27.53B | $21.26B | $65.59B |
| Year 4 ✦ | Stage 1 | $29.18B | $20.67B | $86.26B |
| Year 5 ✦ | Stage 1 | $30.93B | $20.10B | $106.37B |
| Year 6 | Stage 2 | $32.17B | $19.18B | $125.55B |
| Year 7 | Stage 2 | $33.45B | $18.30B | $143.85B |
| Year 8 | Stage 2 | $34.79B | $17.46B | $161.31B |
| Year 9 | Stage 2 | $36.18B | $16.66B | $177.97B |
| Year 10 | Stage 2 | $37.63B | $15.90B | $193.86B |
| Terminal | — | TV=$593.4B | PV(TV)=$250.7B (56% of EV) | EV=$444.5B |
| Intrinsic Value | — | — | EV $444.5B − Net Debt → Equity / Shares | $204 |
| Period | Stage | FCFF | PV of FCFF | Cumulative EV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 ✦ | Stage 1 | $25.50B | $23.61B | $23.61B |
| Year 2 ✦ | Stage 1 | $27.54B | $23.61B | $47.22B |
| Year 3 ✦ | Stage 1 | $29.74B | $23.61B | $70.83B |
| Year 4 ✦ | Stage 1 | $32.12B | $23.61B | $94.44B |
| Year 5 ✦ | Stage 1 | $34.69B | $23.61B | $118.05B |
| Year 6 | Stage 2 | $36.43B | $22.95B | $141.01B |
| Year 7 | Stage 2 | $38.25B | $22.32B | $163.33B |
| Year 8 | Stage 2 | $40.16B | $21.70B | $185.02B |
| Year 9 | Stage 2 | $42.17B | $21.09B | $206.12B |
| Year 10 | Stage 2 | $44.28B | $20.51B | $226.63B |
| Terminal | — | TV=$912.1B | PV(TV)=$422.5B (65% of EV) | EV=$649.1B |
| Intrinsic Value | — | — | EV $649.1B − Net Debt → Equity / Shares | $298 |
| Period | Stage | FCFF | PV of FCFF | Cumulative EV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 ✦ | Stage 1 | $26.50B | $24.65B | $24.65B |
| Year 2 ✦ | Stage 1 | $29.15B | $25.22B | $49.88B |
| Year 3 ✦ | Stage 1 | $32.06B | $25.81B | $75.69B |
| Year 4 ✦ | Stage 1 | $35.27B | $26.41B | $102.10B |
| Year 5 ✦ | Stage 1 | $38.80B | $27.03B | $129.12B |
| Year 6 | Stage 2 | $41.13B | $26.65B | $155.77B |
| Year 7 | Stage 2 | $43.59B | $26.28B | $182.05B |
| Year 8 | Stage 2 | $46.21B | $25.91B | $207.96B |
| Year 9 | Stage 2 | $48.98B | $25.55B | $233.51B |
| Year 10 | Stage 2 | $51.92B | $25.19B | $258.70B |
| Terminal | — | TV=$1343.5B | PV(TV)=$651.8B (72% of EV) | EV=$910.5B |
| Intrinsic Value | — | — | EV $910.5B − Net Debt → Equity / Shares | $418 |
| WACC \ gT | 1.5% | 2.0% | 2.5% | 3.0% | 3.5% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.5% | $351 | $378 | $412 | $456 | $514 |
| 7.0% | $318 | $339 | $365 | $397 | $439 |
| 7.5% | $289 | $306 | $327 | $352 | $383 |
| 8.0% | $266 | $279 | $296 | $315 | $339 |
| 8.5% | $245 | $257 | $270 | $286 | $304 |
| 9.0% | $228 | $237 | $248 | $261 | $276 |
| 9.5% | $212 | $220 | $229 | $240 | $252 |
| 10.0% | $199 | $206 | $213 | $222 | $232 |
| 10.5% | $187 | $193 | $199 | $206 | $215 |
Green = >10% above current price. Red = >10% below. Gold = within ±10%.
Log-linear trend fitted to full price history. ±1.5σ bands. Green shaded zone = bottom 25% of historical range — historically attractive entry.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Annual DPS | $2.520 |
| Current Yield | 0.85% |
| Consecutive Growth Years | 18 |
| 1-yr DPS CAGR | +17.2% |
| 3-yr DPS CAGR | +14.8% |
| 5-yr DPS CAGR | +13.5% |
| 10-yr DPS CAGR | — |
| Payout Ratio (DPS/EPS) | 23.7% |
| FCF Payout Ratio | 22.0% |
| Sustainability Verdict | Safe |
| Year | Low / Actual | Avg | High | # Analysts | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | $7.00 | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2023 | $8.28 | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2024 | $9.73 | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2025 | $10.20 | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2026 | $12.50 | $13.11 | $14.80 | 24 | Estimate |
| 2027 | $13.00 | $14.83 | $16.20 | 22 | Estimate |
| 2028 | $14.50 | $16.20 | $18.00 | 10 | Estimate |
| Year | Low / Actual | Avg | High | # Analysts | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | $29.3B | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2023 | $32.7B | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2024 | $35.9B | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2025 | $40.0B | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2026 | $43.0B | $45.5B | $48.0B | 24 | Estimate |
| 2027 | $47.0B | $50.2B | $53.0B | 22 | Estimate |
- Global duopoly moat: Visa + Mastercard process ~85% of global card volume. Network effects, data moat, and issuer switching costs create a near-impregnable franchise.
- EM structural growth: 60% of world population remains underbanked. India alone could be a $100B+ opportunity over the next decade as UPI opens to foreign networks.
- FCF compounding: 55%+ FCF margins, $23B+ FCF growing 9-12%/yr. Management returns 100%+ of FCF via buybacks and dividends. FCF/share is the primary value driver.
- New flow expansion: B2B payments (~$150T market), government disbursements, cross-border SMB payments are all early innings — higher-margin new flows expanding TAM materially.
- AI margin leverage: Fraud detection and customer service AI reduce losses and drive operating leverage. Sustainable 60%+ operating margins without sacrificing growth investment.
Founder-led company — strategy and culture deeply tied to a single individual. Succession planning is a material risk.
Compensation: Equity-based compensation present · Comp reference: $31M
Processed transactions · Visa Chief Executive Officer Ryan McInerney reflects on fiscal year 2025
© History Oasis / Created via Midjourney · Dee Hock was the visionary founder of Visa, who in 1970 brought together the various BankAmericard licensee banks to form the cooperative NBI/Visa USA, serving as its first banking CEO unti
Visa Inc. is led by a team of individuals with world-class experience and skills in financial services and corporate management. These established professionals collaborate to drive Visa's business forward through product and network i
Three things to note when we look ... in 2024 to the first quarter in 2025. First, incentives. There are a number of factors impacting incentives, especially in Q1 and H1 so let me go through each part. As I mentioned earlier, Q4 incentives
He served in various leadership roles at leading technology companies, providing him with deep insights into financial planning, analysis, and strategic financial management. His background includes extensive expertise in corporate finance,
- good benefits
- great culture
- good pay
- recommend
May 16, 2025 · Anonymous employee · Current employee, more than 5 years · Recommend · CEO approval · Business outlook · Pros · there are a lot of smart employees working hard. Cons · company is going through change, but NOT for the better.
Log in to Glassdoor. Sign in to view job alerts, saved jobs, followed companies and more. Don't have an account? Sign up now.
Nov 1, 2025 · Softare engineer - i · Current employee, less than 1 year · Atlanta, GA · Recommend · CEO approval · Business Outlook · Pros · - Good culture and WLB - Nice work environment - Meaningful work · Cons · - Pay is
| Tier | Price | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — Starter | ≤$365 | Begin position |
| Tier 2 — Add | ≤$310 | Add on weakness |
| Tier 3 — Full | ≤$280 | Full allocation |
| Sell Alert | ≥$435 | Above fair value — consider trimming |